NotScripts

NotScripts used on LifeHacker

NotScripts used on LifeHacker

Options Page Showing the Whitelist

Options Page Showing the Whitelist

NotScripts is a break through Google Chrome extension that gives you greater control over what javascript, iframes, and plugins run in your browser to increase security and lower the CPU usage. NotScripts can help to mitigate attacks like cross-site scripting (XSS) and drive by downloads by giving you control over what third-party javascript and content loads on the sites you visit.

NotScripts uses a unique and novel method to provide this “NoScript” like functionality in Google Chrome that was not previously possible. It introduces a break through technique of intelligent HTML5 storage caching to over come the limitations in Google Chrome that prevented an extension like this from being made before. This is one of the key extensions that many people have been waiting for since Google Chrome came out.

NotScripts is inspired by the “NoScript” addon for Firefox and seeks to emulate it within the limitations of the Google Chrome extensions API. It is not affiliated with “NoScript“, I just happen to like it’s functionality and wanted it on Google Chrome.

NEW!: NotScripts V0.9.2 is released with major interface change!

Download Links

https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn

You can download NotScripts for Google Chrome over at it’s Google Chrome extension page. The link is above. Remember to read the rest of the page for instructions on how to use NotScripts. In particular, you will be required to set a password for NotScripts by navigating to it’s folder on your hard drive.

Test NotScripts’ Ability to Block Third-Party Javascript Here

***START OF TEST AREA***

This test is taken from my Better Pop Up Blocker extension for Google Chrome and loads a simple javascript file from one of my Google Code pages to demonstrate blocking third-party javascript. If you are using Better Pop Up Blocker right now, please whitelist Optimal Cycling for this test.

Ensure you have javascript enabled for this page and then click somewhere in this green text or white space and three pop up windows will open that will take you to Google, Bing, & Yahoo all at the same time if you don’t have NotScripts running.

Notice that this is just text and not a link at all and there is no indication that clicking here will do anything. The pop ups will even load if you click on white space!!!

.

.

The method I used here can be used for anything, even a picture that doesn’t link anywhere. Hover over the image below and you will see that it doesn’t link anywhere. However, click on it and you will still get a pop up! Does this annoying method sound familiar?:

With NotScripts, you can block these types of third-party javascripts that get included on many sites.

***END OF TEST AREA***

First Install Requires a NotScripts Password to be Set

NotScripts Requires a Password to be Set

NotScripts Requires a Password to be Set

http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/change-password/

A NotScripts password is required to be set for the initial use on a computer or if NotScripts was updated. The password is used to protect your privacy by preventing web sites from viewing the NotScripts whitelist caches. Due to technical limitations, you are required to open a file to set the password.

NotScripts caches some settings in the HTML5 local and session storage for each site visited to enable the blocking to work. These settings are the whitelist of sites that you allow scripts/iframes/plugins to run on. However, the HTML5 storage is also accessible by the sites you visit because it was originally meant for them to use for caching. To overcome this privacy issue, NotScripts encrypts the settings with AES-128 using the Standford Javascript Crypto Library to prevent access.

Visit the above link for detailed instructions and screenshots.

Frequently Asked Questions

http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/faq/

Visit the above link to find help on frequently asked questions about getting other extensions to work with NotScripts or for troubleshooting site compatibility. Please note that NotScripts requires the use of the HTML5 storage in Google Chrome. If you set Google Chrome to delete your cookies/HTML5 storage after every browser exit, NotScripts will not be able to effectively cache the site specific permissions and you will see frequent reloads. The default setup of Google Chrome works fine with NotScripts.

Limitations

http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/limitations/

NotScripts is the best “NoScript” inspired extension for Google Chrome to date. However, there are a few limitations that you should know about before using NotScript. They relate to block the deprecated <APPLET></APPLET> tags, inline script blocking, and caching reloads. I highly recommend you read the article to understand these issues that could be fixed in the future.

Change Log

http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/change-log/

I will be keeping a list of all NotScripts releases and changes in the change log. If you want to know what changed from version to version, this is the best place to go.

Code

http://code.google.com/p/notscripts/

The source code from NotScripts is available for viewing online and download at it’s Google Code page above. SVN is used for version control.

License

http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/license/

NotScripts is open source and is released under the GNU General Public License V3. You can view the license and the license/links to the other projects that I’ve used code from in the above link.

Donate

If you find NotScripts useful, consider making a donation to the project of any amount you wish. Simply click on the PayPal donate button below:


185 Comments »

  • Phil said:

    This could be useful if Google Chrome 7 gets click-to-load built in for plugins and you want to use that instead. Additionally, the following two lines will disable NotScripts from blocking iframes and scripts, respectively:

    const DO_NOT_BLOCK_IFRAMES = true;
    const DO_NOT_BLOCK_SCRIPTS = true;

    I post these last two lines here for reference only since including them into your password file will completely defeat the purpose of NotScripts.

    Hi, in the password file these”const DO_NOT_BLOCK_IFRAMES = true;
    const DO_NOT_BLOCK_SCRIPTS = true; “two lines were already in there so i deleted them. Was i supposed to or not ?, i’m a little confused since it should defeat the purpose. After restarting chrome i went back to your test area and clicked the pic and the pop ups appeared. Nice idea, thanks a lot :)

  • ericwong said:

    @Phil, the new password files have the lines written in for convenience, but they are commented with the “//” characters so they don’t do anything. You can leave them in with the “//” if you like. The password file is a regular javascript file so javascript rules apply.

  • Anonymous Coward said:

    I have a bunch of scripts on my site like this:

    and I’m running http://localhost/

    NotScript doesn’t allow me to allow these scripts even when i add localhost and 127.0.0.1 to the whitelist. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?

  • Anonymous Coward said:

    I have a bunch of scripts on my site like this:

    and I’m running http://localhost/

    NotScript doesn’t allow me to allow these scripts even when i add localhost and 127.0.0.1 to the whitelist. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?

  • Anonymous Coward said:

    Script line keeps disappearing. anyway script tag source is “/files/jquery.js”

  • Anonymous Coward said:

    Can we also get a feature to allow current domain like noscript has? You shouldn’t need to whitelist scripts running on the current domain because chances are they’re essential for the sites functionality

  • Phil said:

    Thank you for your swift reply Mr. Ericwong , i’ll leave them in as advised, have a nice day, and thanks again :)

  • ericwong said:

    @First Anonymous: Instead of http://localhost/, you can try http://127.0.0.1 instead which is equivalent. But I will modify NotScripts to recognize http://localhost/. Is there any other url’s like the one you gave without a top level domain like .com, .org, etc???

  • ericwong said:

    @second Anonymous, yes, I’m working on the temporarily allow this page feature for the next update of NotScripts which is due out mid next week.

  • NotScripts – The NoScript option for Chrome | Automation Adventures said:

    [...] makes controlling which JavaScripts, IFrames and plugins run in your browser a whole lot easier. NotScripts is developed by Eric Wong on the Optimal Cycling [...]

  • Angus S-F said:

    If you’re adding “localhost”, it would be a Good Thing to recognize *_ANY_* synonym for localhost that is in “hosts”. For example, Spiceworks adds the following line to hosts:

    127.0.0.1 spiceworks

    and Spiceworks is highly dependent on scripting. I have to disable NotScripts to run Spiceworks.

  • ericwong said:

    @Angus, does that mean that when you type http://spiceworks into your own browser, it will actually resolve to http://127.0.0.1 ?

    Edit: Ah, yes, I remember now. Host files. I will tweak the regex so that it works for all of them.

  • Brad said:

    I can’t get Slacker(http://www.slacker.com/) to work with NotScripts. I’ve whitelisted all the scripts that show up in the drop-down but still doesn’t work. What am I missing?

  • ericwong said:

    @Brad, NotScripts V0.9.2 is coming out tomorrow or on Wednesday. It has compatibility fixes and many improvements and I just tried it on Slacker and it works on there. So the best thing to do right now is to wait a day or two for the new release: http://optimalcycling.com/2010/08/23/teaser-for-notscripts-v0-9-2/

  • waspoza said:

    Hi, quick question:

    lets say we have site http://www.website com and also domain ads.website.com.
    Can i block scripts from ads.website com, but leave http://www.website.com intact?

    Thanks in advance.

  • ericwong said:

    @waspoza, not at this point. I made NotScripts so it recognizes both those addresses you gave as website.com because they came from the same domain and this is what most people expect to happen and it makes for much more efficient and compact whitelists. Perhaps in a future version I will incorporate a blacklist for such purposes.

  • waspoza said:

    @ericwong, yea black list would be great, thanks.

  • Google Chrome, my web browser of choice? | Ferolare said:

    [...] that first drew me to Firefox has now made its appearance for Chrome, sort of, in the form of NotScript. I’m not entirely sure if it’s better than NoScript, going by its list of limitations, [...]

  • anonymous said:

    Eric, all i’d like to say is: Thank you so much for this great extension. Hats off! I hope it will get many updates in the future.

    It’s on its best way to get better than NoScript.

  • Mooster Cow said:

    I this where I should suggest my suggestions?
    If not, ah well.

    My first suggestion is to allow subscription to whitelists and blacklists (like you can with the adblock extension) in order to save time and effort. Another thing that would be nice would be allowing all scripts when on certain sites (such as online newspapers, which get all their money from ads). The last thing I’d like to see is more aesthetic. Truthfully, I find the pyramid icon sorta ugly, but it’s too useful to dispose of. Ideally, the best place for it to be would be in the wrench menu, but if that’s not possible, a “prettier” icon would be sweet too.

    Thanks for your awesome extension, and hope to see more updates soon.

  • ericwong said:

    For the subscriptions, I’m not sure that’s a good idea at this point since everyone visits different sites and has different requirements as to what sites need javascript. What I think I could do instead is to manually create a list of the top websites on the web that need javascript to run properly and give the user the option to merge this list with their own whitelist. This should save new users time.

    As for the icon, I think I can make it so that you have an option to choose from a list of pre-supplied icons.

  • Michael said:

    This is almost a great thing, thanks for your work.

    The major problem, though, is that while I can now control JS execution, I have to enable Cookies/Web storage to NotScript work right.

    Which kind of just replaces one major problem with a lesser one.

  • Michael said:

    To clarify: Whitelist seems to work even with cookies/web storage disabled; I wonder why clink-enabling/disabling from the URL bar button does not simply add the site to the respective list, which would eliminate the need to have cookies enabled.

    (I use a minimal cookie policy where I only enable cookies for a handful of sites I need to log in frequently. Same for JavaScript.)

  • ericwong said:

    If cookies/HTML5 storage is not enabled for a particular site, NotScripts will still work but it will just block everything since it can’t cache the site specific settings.

  • Jason said:

    Great product, really like it- but one issue I can’t solve is that I can’t get notscript to work with the bookmarklet I use to share articles on google reader. I have to completely disable it to get it to work.

    The javascript reads:

    javascript:var b=document.body;var GR________bookmarklet_domain=’http://www.google.com’;if(b&&!document.xmlVersion){void(z=document.createElement(‘script’));void(z.src=’http://www.google.com/reader/ui/link-bookmarklet.js’);void(b.appendChild(z));}else{}

    Is there a way to whitelist this command so that it’ll work?

  • ericwong said:

    I hope to eliminate the use of the HTML5 storage in a future version if Google Chrome gets something like the canLoad function that Apple Safari has.

  • ericwong said:

    @Jason, it looks like that bookmarklet requires that you whitelist the current page you are on with NotScripts (and google.com if you don’t have that whitelisted already). Unfortunately, there is no way to distinguish between javascript from a webpage and javascript from a bookmarklet in Google Chrome. If you run lots of bookmarklets, I recommend you consider using NotScripts in WHITELIST_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL mode which allows same origin scripts: http://optimalcycling.com/2010/09/06/blacklist-mode-implemented-for-notscripts-v0-9-6/

    This will make life much easier for you than running NotScripts in the default whitelist mode when using bookmarklets.

  • Michael said:

    Yeah, um, I seem to be unable to make myself clear somehow. It’s probably because I don’t know much about Chromium’s structure.

    So if I make a whitelist entry, NotScripts can enable JS, and I can still disable some or all cookies for that site. If I use NotScripts’ URL bar button, I can only do that when I enable HTML5 storage/cookies for that site.

    Is that because Chromium uses a different permission set for the “extension” page and regular pages?

  • ericwong said:

    The reason is because NotScripts caches some data in the HTML5 storage area of the actual website and when it does this, Chromium sees it just like another website setting HTML5 storage. Therefore, the website needs to be able to set HTML5 storage and this permission is separate from extensions.

  • Michael said:

    Thanks for the info!

    How do *you* manage cookies and JS separately – or don’t you?

  • ericwong said:

    For me personally, I just have Google Chrome set to allow cookies (the default option in Google Chrome). Every so often (a few months), I will manually just clear out all the history/cache/cookies in Google Chrome. I use NotScripts to selectively allow scripting.

  • Alan said:

    I think I have the same question as Michael. I would like to have a whitelist of sites that can set cookies, and a separate, independent whitelist of sites that are allowed to run scripts. Is there any way I can do this using NotScripts?

  • ericwong said:

    Currently, NotScripts requires the ability to use localStorage which is sort of like cookies but it is the HTML5 version. NotScripts doesn’t require cookies itself, but you will need another extension to control cookies in specific ways.

  • Alan said:

    I think I misspoke. What I meant is: I want two independent whitelists, one for cookies and one for scripts. Currently, my cookie whitelist is to go into Chrome’s preferences and disable all cookies, and then add a whitelist of exceptions (it’s the same set-up that Michael described in his comments). However, NotScripts then cannot allow scripts on sites on which I don’t allow cookies. Do you know of a different way for me to block cookies that would let NotScripts work properly?

  • ericwong said:

    The only extension that I know that does cookie filtering/blocking right now is “Edit this Cookie” https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/fngmhnnpilhplaeedifhccceomclgfbg

  • Bartek said:

    I just wanted to thank you for this particular plugin for Chrome. It was a functionality that I have been missing the most since I switched from Firefox (which was a must because it got strangely broken) to Chrome.

  • Stach said:

    Has anyone figured out how to get the Roboform extension to work with NotScripts? I tried adding the following 2 lines to the end of the “CHANGE__PASSWORD__HERE.s” file, but that didn’t help.

    const DO_NOT_BLOCK_EMBEDS = true;
    const DO_NOT_BLOCK_OBJECTS = true;

    Thanks in advance for your help!
    -Stach

  • ericwong said:

    Hello, which features of the Roboform extension are not working with NotScripts? I just did a quick test with the Roboform extension with NotScripts using Google Chrome 7 and there didn’t seem to be issues on the sites I used.

  • Stach said:

    ericwong, thanks for getting back to me so fast. I agree, the Roboform extension appears to be “working the same” with NotScripts. It looks like I was a little impatient, in waiting for it to appear on some of the websites that I visit. Sorry for the confusion. -Stach

  • Cris said:

    I am a Chrome user who immigrated from FireFox. So glad to find NotScripts!

    I have one feature request: could you change the icon to be something other than a Green dot if there’s at least one site whose scripting is blocked? Currently, if even one site is blocked, the page icon shows a green dot, which is misleading. So, it’d be cool if you had:

    1. the standard pyramid icon for all sites blocked,
    2. the green icon for all sites allowed,
    3. some other icon (transparent green?) for at least one site blocked.

  • ericwong said:

    @Cris, I’m working on a beta of the next version of NotScripts for Chrome right now that will address the icon requests.

  • long duckdong said:

    Thank you for this very much! I will complete my move to chrome for good now. Simple to use with out nay problems at all!

  • softwaretester said:

    Hi,
    I’ve heard noscript for firefox has malicious code. Could somebody ensure the opposite for chrome’s notscript?

  • Giovany said:

    Hey there i am using NotScript on Google Chromium browser but i cannot find the password file i need to change .. what am i supposed to do?

  • Simon said:

    In stable Chrome, this extension works well. In dev Chrome, however, the cascade list is (OFTEN) too narrow and shows nothing.

  • Scooter said:

    The big thing I’m missing from NotScript that NoScript has is the ability to only allow certain subdomains. For example, I allow a.alphabet.com but not b.alphabet.com or even alphabet.com itself. Working IT at a university I tend to visit a lot of student webpages hosted in their departments or from their dorms, all of it on our domain and I don’t want to blindly trust them. But I would like to trust my servers.

  • AntigateX said:

    So… when NotScripts will have full abilities to block scripts? Or this is unreachable?
    What are your plans about it?

  • baron wasteland said:

    WHY OH WHY? WHY, upon attempting to install NotScript, does a window open which asks for permission to ACCESS ALL MY PC’S CONTENTS AND THE WEBSITES I VISIT?
    Forgive me, but surely it is this kind of invasion of privacy we need to avoid? To publicise and if possible OUTLAW?
    To simply give carte blanche permission for a private company – ANY private company – to access the contents of my PC?
    Are you kidding?
    I do not doubt for one moment that you are all fine, upstanding, honest, pure as the driven snow, etc, but as a private company – even IF you have a decent, strong and moral privacy policy – can be bought and sold on the open market, by ANYONE with the dosh.

  • ericwong said:

    Hello, that message from Google Chrome appears on most extensions when you install because the extension needs to access the pages you visit in order to be able to block scripts. It is a common comment by users and you can see others asking why on many other extensions. The message is overly alarming, but you should be aware of what extensions you install and do so only if you trust the source. You can see from the source code of NotScripts in the Google Code page that it doesn’t do anything other than block scripts.

  • STiFU said:

    Hey there,

    I am using this application in Opera 11 and it is really useful. However, after some time, it became nearly unusable, because it takes a lot of time to display the blockable URLs (like 30 seconds to one minute). I always have A LOT of tabs open (30+), so maybe this is related to that.

    I wonder whether things could be speeded up a little. My guess would be that you fetch the blockable URLs from all tabs and not just from the one currently active, which would of course be preferred and a lot faster. I mean, why would one even want to have those URLs of all tabs? After all, one can just go ahead and click “globally allow all” for exactly such a matter.

    Cheers,
    STiFU

  • ericwong said:

    @STiFU, I’m guessing due to all the tabs you have open there are also lots of iFrames in them too. Due to a bug in the Opera Extensions API, messaging the open pages does not work correctly if there are iFrames in the page so I had to implement a workaround that shows the scripts from the current page as well as all the iFrames because it is impossible to distinguish the two with the current Opera Extensions API messaging. This bug has been known by Opera for quite a long time and I’m hoping it they would have fixed it already.

  • m32po said:

    I am a Firefox+NoScript user who is recently evaluating Chrome+NotScripts. Great extension for Chrome.

    About the icon, it would be useful to have different icon for every state:

    - fully not allowed
    - partially allowed
    - fully allowed

    Please! Don’t rely only on colors, for these icon states! Like other people like me, I have some problems with colors, I am a little color blind, problems with reds and greens. Please, add also a clear symbol to state the permissions.
    Thanks!

  • STiFU said:

    @Eric: Thanks. Now that you say that, I remember reading something like that in the options of NotScripts. As a temporary solution, maybe you could make it optional to block scripts on iframes? After all, many people have iframes disabled completely and there would probably be a huge performance gain for multitabbing-users. :)

  • randomcore said:

    great extension, thank you!

    now you should spend it a supress referer feature like the chrome extension “NOREF”. but as per site feature, not globally. like firefox addon “refcontrol” can do.

  • willie said:

    Sir I admire your effort, However when a user sees the words “navigate to” it’s pretty much over. Nearly was for me mainly because I really don’t have time to hack things constantly in order to acquire needed functionality.

    Your noscripts is/will be essential to the broader adoption of Google Chrome browser.

    Kudos and Thank You for addressing this problem.

    G’day!

  • raubmuecke said:

    Hi!

    How to block 2nd level domains? I want allow “downloads.serienjunkies.xyz” and disallow “serienjunkies.xyz”. Is that possible?

    And how about Referer blocking like randomcore mentioned?

    Good tool. Thank you very much!

  • raubmuecke said:

    How to ALLOW 2nd-level and BLOCK top-level domains… above :-) Thanks.

  • bob said:

    just wondering, what is taking so long for an update to the chrome extension?

  • tmp said:

    NotScripts for Opera:

    Opera 11.01
    NotScripts V1.0.4

    if you open a page in where scripts by default are blocked,
    close that page,
    and than use the ‘reopen closed tap’ function in opera,
    that page opens again, but scripts are executed.

  • B. S. said:

    Given that the first thing I see on this page is … updated (to vX), it would be useful if clicking on the pyramid showed the version. e.g. right below ‘Options Home’ a little ‘NotScripts v.X.Y’ would be useful.

    So I could see if I need to update. (I don’t.)

    Running v.96 – so the ‘update’ notice on this page could use some updating.

    Thanks for making this.

    Enhancement Request: let me choose sub-domains. e.g. temp allow google.com, but deny ads.google.com.

  • emcee said:

    Noscripts is awesome. It makes securely using my favorite browser, Opera, possible.

    I have run into an issue. I was trying a scriptblocking approach similar to one I have used in hosts files.

    For noscripts, i downloaded the ad server list from http://pgl.yoyo.org/as/serverlist.php?showintro=0, and copied and pasted it into my blacklist, a total of 2731 lines.

    The current result is that the noscripts gui is slow or unresponsive. Should I consider a list this size beyond the capabilities of the program?

    Browser: Opera 11
    OS: Windows 7

  • M said:

    NotScripts is great! Just installing it reduced my Google Chrome CPU use by about 70% (I usually run with 60-100 tabs open). One thing I’d like to see is a way of finding out exactly which one of the blocked sites a blocked plugin comes from. For example http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_to_launch_major_new_social_network_called_c.php I see 9 sites in the pulldown. I’d like to see the slideshow but I don’t know which of the sites to enable.

    Another thing, perhaps a setting to temporarily enable a site but just for a specific page?

  • userschmoozer said:

    Hi there,
    I’ve been using the NotScripts addon for a while and I’ve been loving it ever since. I’ve got one serious problem, tho: In Chrome on my old Mac (10.6) it works perfectly, but on my new Win7/64 Laptop with Chrome10 it doesn’t really work at all. After installing and passwording etc. neither the whitelist entries are taken into account, not does clicking on the Allow/Temp buttons work. NotScripts seems to be stuck at blocking everything (including this very site ;) ).
    I have absolutely no idea what might be causing this. Any ideas?

  • alex fang said:

    Hi there,
    I’ve been using the NotScripts addon and its really great!
    One thing I’d like to say is I can’t block this site’s javascript
    http://weiwuhui.com/4157.html

    thanks.

    browser: chrome

  • nir said:

    how do i remove notscripts ?

  • bob said:

    Is this extension being developed for Chrome/Chromium (or even Opera for that matter) anymore?

  • John Smith said:

    @emcee Don’t use NoScripts for that, instead use Operas built in Content Blocker and urlfilter.ini. See here: http://my.opera.com/Tamil/blog/index.dml/tag/urlfilter.ini

  • rogerwilco75 said:

    Hi!

    First of all a big thank you for providing this useful extension.

    I am running the latest Opera Version 11.10 Build 2092 now. NotScript doesn’t seem to be working any more. User Java Script space is allowed as recommended, but the site’s scripts aren’t listen any more.

    It worked fine with Opera 11.01, which I then updated today and noticed this issue. So I uninstalled Opera and all it’s files (only backed up a few of the Profile folder like bookmarks, wand, notes, sessions..) and was hoping for this to fix it, which it unfortunately didn’t.

    Hopefully this is some useful input to you and this project.

  • ericwong said:

    I have submitted NotScripts v1.1.0 today to the Opera Extension moderators that supports Opera 11.10. It should be out for download in a couple of days. There was a syntax change to postMessage in the Extensions API. I have also fixed the issue where NotScripts would list scripts from multiple sites if there were iFrames so NotScripts now works properly (it was caused by a workaround to a bug in the Extensions API of previous versions of Opera).

  • bob said:

    thank you for developing this very good extension. my guess is that the chromium version of notscripts is still waiting for the api to catch up? sorry about the last two posts that assume that sound a little harsh…

  • OptimalCycling (author) said:

    Yes, I’m subscribed to the Chromium Extension API bugs that are relevant to NotScripts and unfortunately, they have not been resolved and are not marked with a high priority even though many people have starred the issues. The most important Extension API issue is accessing settings from within content scripts that are not affected by threading. This issue is why there is a required password and AES encryption in NotScripts to keep it secure as well as the code there to handle the asynchronous timing of accessing the settings.

    And no worries, I’m not offended. :)

  • rogerwilco75 said:

    Thanks for the fast update to make it work again with Opera 11.10!

    Also the fact that apparently now only the scipts of the according tab are listed and not all at once is a great improvement.

    Again, a BIG thank you!

  • frayedknot2 said:

    It would be very helpful for the less technically oriented to explain how to get to the necessary folder and have the ability to add the password in a linux system. Even after successfully changed the password once I am now unable to do so again even after a clean install. Very fustrating for a baby boomer without technical training.

  • Luca said:

    About NotScripts:

    Great extension, but I can’t unblock the Silverlight content here:http://www.montalbano.rai.it/dl/portali/site/puntata/ContentItem-bdbedf33-b701-4dd5-91a7-baca7737c0ad.html

    What’s wrong?

  • So finden Sie schnell Ihre Emails said:

    [...] Sollte  diese Abbildung  nicht auf Ihrem Bildschirm erscheinen, achten Sie bitte darauf, dass Sie keine weiteren Plugins nutzen, die JavaScript verbieten. Dazu zählt insbesondere die Erweiterung NotScript. [...]

  • phil said:

    I can’t get it to work. Even though I got the “the password is set” message it keeps blocking everything – even the stuff on the whitelist. For example youtube, which is on there by default, didn’t do any script stuff (closing widgets..).

    I restarted Chrome (v12) several times, deactivated all other extensions and tried other sites and clicking every option that “allow”-dialog offered. Yes, local storage and javascript is enabled. Clicking “allow” even added the url to the whitelist, but as said it kept blocking everything.

  • notscript for chrome | neraliu's life hacking blog said:

    [...] reference - http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/ [...]

  • Dan H said:

    What I’d love to see is functionality that would allow me to block a site from within other sites. For example, I would like to block facebook.com for all sites except at Facebook.com itself.

  • John O said:

    The latest version of Chrome with Notscripts has broken my auth login at Stack exchange.

    http://chat.stackexchange.com/help

    Chrome version 13.0.782.107 m

    “Notscripts encountered invalid encryption for this sites settings /exceeded storage quota”

    Clearing or resetting html5 storage does nothing to resolve this

    Is it Chrome or Notscripts causing this?

  • Me said:

    I keep running into the “exceeded storage quota” message as well, it’s becoming a real problem…

  • Ray said:

    First of all big thanks to Eric Wong! Without notscripts I wouldn’t have switched to Chrome, and now that I finally did it has certainly has improved my browsing experience.

    I have a small suggestion for an option I hope to see in a future update. It’s nothing big, just a little checkbox that allows you to prevent reloading.

    Sometimes you may forget that you’re blocking scripts, since many websites still work fine without javascript. The next thing you’re filling out a form and you realize that it might not submit without javascript, so you quickly allow the site, but on reload you loose all your form data.

    I used the option in noscript to disable auto reloading for this reason. It would be nice to have this option in notscripts for google chrome.

  • 5 stvari za siguran Internet – 2. dio | Not A Blog said:

    [...] je dodatak slične namjene (NotScripts) za Chrome i [...]

  • Paul said:

    Over time, I am running into the “Notscripts encountered invalid encryption for this sites settings /exceeded storage quota” more and more often, and on sites that used to work properly.

    Getting NotScripts to clear doesn’t do anything, removing data and cache with Chromes preferences also doesn’t solve the problem. This is using Mac Os X 10.6.8

  • brit said:

    how must I put the password for NotScripts in IRON. Cannot find under
    C:\Users\….\AppData\Local a folder of SRWare or IRON. Thanks for information.

  • coderx said:

    Hello and thanks for this cool addon.

    Just wanted to ask if you plan to add support for ipv6 addresses… I’ve been having some trouble with them (they are blocked automatically and no option to block/unblock appears).

    thanks

  • Irma Dalakanitzkova said:

    I have installed the Opera extension from https://addons.Opera.com/en/addons/extensions/details/notscripts, the version at the time of this writing is 1.1.0.

    The problem after installing the extension is that I cannot access the ‘Preferences’ — when right-clicking NoScript’s pyramid icon, they are greyed out. The same when trying to access them via [Ctrl]+[Shift]+[E].

    Double-clicking the pyramid icon instead of right-clicking it opens a blank/ window on the right side of the screen, which looks as if that was supposed to be the NoScripts settings screen. Helas, the window is empty, except for two links ‘Options’ and ‘Home’ at the top of it. Clicking them does not have any effect though.

    Disabling all other extensions does not rectify the problem.

    Is there another way to configure NoScripts from Whitelist to Blacklist and whatever else there might be to configure?

  • JonathanH said:

    Any plans to use the upcoming “webRequest extension API” in chrome 17?

  • Greg A. Woods said:

    NotScripts 0.9.6 is crashing instantly and repeatedly after relaunch updating Chrome to 17.0.963.12 dev

  • TheAl said:

    Hi

    There is a little bug / missing feature:
    Chrome/Iron doesn´t display the area in a webpage if js is disabled.
    Webdevelopers can use a workaround:

    instead of
    $(‘html’).removeClass(‘no-js’);

    div.no-js {display: none;}
    html.no-js .no-js {display: block;}

    But it would be easier if chrome-notscript would recognize .

    Al

  • TheAl said:

    (oops. html tags are not displayed. So this post without brackets…)

    Hi

    There is a little bug or missing feature:
    Chrome/Iron doesn´t display the area in a webpage if js is disabled.

    Webdevelopers can use a workaround:

    html class=”no-js”
    div class=”no-js” instead of noscript

    $(‘html’).removeClass(‘no-js’);

    div.no-js {display: none;}
    html.no-js .no-js {display: block;}

    But it would be easier if chrome-notscript would recognize .

    Al

  • WolfgangF said:

    There are some problems, if you work in google chrome with profiles. In this case, the link in “Options -> Password Status” is wrong. It should not be %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn but %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\ProfileAndNr\Extensions\odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn.9.6_0. For “ProfileAndNr” you must insert the nr of the used profile e.g. “Profile 1″, “Profile 2″ without quotes. This is for Google Chrome since version 17.xx.

    Best regards
    Wolfgang

  • Wikipedia SOPA Protest Easy Workaround | Down Home Country Coding With Scott Selikoff and Jeanne Boyarsky said:

    [...] If you want to continue using Wikipedia today, install a JavaScript blocker into your browser and set it to block anything from “wikimedia.org”. In Firefox, I recommend NoScript and in Google Chrome I recommend NotScripts. [...]

  • Protect your Privacy | Fallen Angel Gabriel said:

    [...] NotScripts [...]

  • Cross-site Scripting – Prevention | Cyber Crud said:

    [...] also the (unoriginal) NotScripts for you Chrome and Opera users. However, it’s very simplistic and nowhere near as featureful [...]

  • 最大化保护您的隐私,各种扩展介绍! | Target CN ( Target China ) said:

    [...] NotScripts 阻断JavaScript Opera [...]

  • stormbeta said:

    I’m also getting the “Exceeded storage quota” error others reported, and on most sites. When the error comes up, setting sites to allow or block does not work correctly.

    I can “fix” the problem by allowing third party cookies, but I don’t wish to do this and I was under the impression that NotScripts should be able to operate even if third party cookies are blocked.

    If there is some setting or option I’m missing, I’d really like to know.

  • Web Browser Applications for Better Privacy | Tech Cure … said:

    [...] 6. NotScript – Gives you greater control over JavaScript, Java, Flash and other plugins to increase security [...]

  • Alexander said:

    Does this extension prevent CSRF in any way as it does NoScript?

  • William Browne said:

    I are in possession of stumbled on your internet-site back in time thus develop surely have been observation remind yourself such a utilizing average. In which case you incredibly loads of useful information observing so i enjoy look out for this website as well. Keep up property nice job!

  • Rut said:

    I chose this NotScripts and now the pyramid is above on the right side on the Google Chrome Browser, but I haven´t set the password yet.
    I think I want to get rid of this NotScripts and have more information on it before I use it! How can I get rid of it from my Google Chrome browser, I´m stuck with it and can´t use Google Chrome for Google Mail while I´m in this situtaion? Please help me! Rut in Iceland

  • D_Ramsey said:

    Version 0.9.6 under “Change Log” the last entry is dated Sept 6, 2010. Is this an indication I have installed the software incorrectly? The pyramid appears on each web page and appears to be functioning. Is 0.9.6 the latest version and, if so, does the Change Log correctly reflect the last change (update) date.

  • Marcel said:

    Would be great to see NotScripts on jailbroken iDevices (iPhone & iPad). Any plans to do so?

  • ScriptNo: A preemptive strike against script attacks for Chrome | TechRepublic said:

    [...] was motivated to develop ScriptNo due in large part to NotScripts, the first extension to bring over parts of NoScript — Giorgio Maone’s Firefox extension — to [...]

  • ScriptNo: A preemptive strike against script attacks for Chrome | SIMPLYGRAY said:

    [...] was motivated to develop ScriptNo due in large part to NotScripts, the first extension to bring over parts of NoScript — Giorgio Maone’s Firefox extension — to [...]

  • Windows 8 Discussion Thread - Page 17 said:

    [...] Windows 8 Discussion Thread I'm liking Chrome a lot more since I found Not Scripts (aka No Script for Chrome). I'll be checking out the Metro version of Chrome on Win 8 later. [...]

  • Cord said:

    Hi,

    I use your extension on a Netbook with a 1024×600 resolution. When I open the dialogue on a page with many script-sources, this leads to have the dialogue switch to outside of the screen. I need to move chrome down to see the dialogue.

    I think this is the same problem i had with G+ Game Companion https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hblmfcjnddgfoaclffhjglaibncpcnbn The author then added a configuration to limit maxheight of the window.

  • Lance said:

    One problem I’m having: I cannot get a desired pop-up window to load a particular live charting application unless I temporarily allow all globally, which of course negates the value of NotScript until I revoke that temporary waiver. Sadly, I run this application almost all week, and revoking the waiver kills it straight away. Suggestions appreciated.

  • Timo said:

    Hi,

    thanks for the extension. is it possible to allow all shown scripts by keyboard shortcut? would be great.

  • g amon said:

    I wonder if it’s possible to keep a list of “recently blocked sites” like in noscript. I find it useful in certain situations where I allow javascript from some site and it uses another site where the javascript is blocked. I have no way of knowing what the second site is therefore cannot allow it. I really don’t want to enable javascript on all sites, especially when it’s generally a banking site where this happens.

    Thanks.

  • Alan said:

    I’m currently using NotScripts with the Chromium browser. I like to use the Facebook bookmarklet for sharing web content on Facebook:

    http://www.facebook.com/share_options.php

    But with NotScripts, I have to “Globally Allow All Temporarily” to get it to work. Aside from the inconvenience, I don’t like doing that because I may sometimes forget to turn blocking back on after sharing.

    Is there a way to configure an exception so this bookmarklet will work without turning Noscript blocking off temporarily?

    Thanks

  • Alan said:

    I’ve resigned myself to using WHITELIST_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL mode as described earlier in these comments. But I’m not totally happy about that since it essentially gives script permission to every site I visit. It would be great to have the ability to whitelist a specific script.

  • gdp said:

    Nearly every site with embedded video yields this error:

    ( ! )

    NotScripts encountered invalid encryption for this site's settings / Exceeded storage quota on

    http://www.youtube.com/embed/Y
    50_YscsSvo?fs=1&feature=oembed
    &wmode=transparent

    Click here to reset the
    HTML5 storage
    of the current web page.

    Otherwise, please clear/enable the browser HTML5 storage.

    “Click here” does absolutely nothing — the error always persists.

  • Kerem said:

    Hi,

    Firstly, I would like to thank you for this wonderful extension.
    Then, here is my question:
    How can I backup blacklist/whitelist entries? There should be an option in the future.
    If it would be possible, there should be compatibility with Google Chrome Sync.

    Thank you again…

  • Cooba said:

    Hi! NoScipts is awesome extension!
    I hope someday it will become cloud-like, so I will not have to check whitelist sites on another computer again and again.

  • James K said:

    Two Suggestions for improving NotScripts:

    First the positive improvement suggestions:

    1) Currently with NotScripts, a scripting domain is either globally allowed, or globally disallowed, with all websites/pages looking at the same white-list. I would suggest that some domains could be white-listed for use with only some specific websites/pages. Those websites/pages could have their own specific white-lists, that allow specific scripting domains to be used ONLY when at THEM, but are disallowed everywhere else.

    This would have at least TWO benefits:

    A) This would allow some websites where you WANT to use, say, Social Networking functions, to use them, while disallowing those functions (and their cpu time) everywhere else.

    B) Another use of localized white-lists would be privacy protection. By disallowing the general collection of personal data while shopping and browsing, but STILL ALLOWING a person to use COUPON WEBSITES, where running scripts from ID gathering domains is mandatory for getting the coupon! (I have personally found it to be necessary to white-list some of those otherwise black-listed sites, in order to get many deals.

    2) Apply the changes made to the white/black-lists to ONLY the CURRENTLY DISPLAYED TAB.

    If you like to browse with several tabs open, like I do, having 10 or more tabs reloading at the same time can bring your system to a halt! Limiting the refresh to the current tab would eliminate that problem. (You could even add a button to your icon in each open tab that would remind you, or give you the option to, refresh the page when you looked at it next.)

    I often find myself surprised when I white-list a domain for a particular website, only to see ALL my tabs reloading their webpages. In these cases Chrome will often simply lock up, sometimes taking Windows and the mouse with it! During these events simply switching to an already open command-line can take several minutes, and then using “TASKKILL.EXE” to kill Chrome can take several more.

    It’s one thing to have those changes applied when you load a single page, it’s quite another to have those changes applied to all your open webpages at the same time.

  • James K said:

    NotScripts has been very good to me, but I’ve recently been having problems. (And one more suggestion.)

    1) Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t NotScripts, while in “Globally Allow All Temporarily” mode, use to display all the temporarily used scripting domains used by the current webpage when you clicked the pyramid? And couldn’t you just go through the list and change the “Temporary” setting to the “Allow” setting?

    I ask because I no longer see the list, just a statement that the “Globally Allow All Temporarily” function is being used.

    Is this an update? Has my version become corrupted? Or did I just hallucinate that list?

    2) I’m finding more and more websites that don’t simply show all of the domains that the current webpage wants to use. I assume that this is because the domains/webpages directly linked to by the current webpage also have script dependencies hosted on other domains.

    You can usually get them all by slowly allowing the domains as they show up, but this is tedious work, and is not always successful.

    SUGGESTION: Perhaps you could add a spidering function that crawls down the the banned scripts searching for other domains containing dependent scripts.

    3) I have come across some websites / webpages that will not function even in “Globally Allow All Temporarily” mode.

    For instance I CANNOT purchase anything from Good Old Games unless I totally DEACTIVATE NotScripts!

    Last, I should have put this last part in my previous post, but…

    Some of these problems (especially the problems locking up I describe in my previous post) I believe that I can blame on a failing CPU fan in my Netbook and a built-in protection circuit that throttles my 1.6 GHz CPU (I’ve seen reports of temperatures as high as 105 Celsius, and CPU speeds as low as 768 MHz), and I am waiting with baited breath for one replacement fan (and one extra) from China (must be coming by boat), but usually I don’t see such extreme temperatures and low CPU speeds.

    Anyway, any insights, suggestions, or updates would be appreciated.
    You’ve got my email address.

    Thanks for your time!

    James

  • aj said:

    really like this extension. works very well. thanks. my suggested feature would be to have a simple interactive way to set the password at install time :) also i agree with others here that mention it seems awkward to use when cookies/local storage are not desired at all :)

  • ChuckD said:

    Using Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) and Chrome Version 24.0.1312.52 m
    I’ve added NotStripts and attempted to set password by going to %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User_Data\Default\Extensions\odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn …

    But the folder “odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn” does not exist. I’ve set Windows Explorer Folder Options to show Hidden files and folders. So the folder really isn’t there.

    What do I do to get NotScripts Extension functional in Chrome?

  • BigDummy said:

    I could not for the life of me get this extension to work. When using linkedin, I could not get the extension to allow this site. I tried clicking allow the indicated domain and even allow all in the pop-up action window. Even after adding the linkedin.com domain to the whitelist, it would not function. Obviously, I’m missing something obvious and I would recommend adding “that something” to your getting started documentation. Software should not raise my blood pressure to dangerous levels if it is to be called ‘helpful’.

  • http://tinyurl.com/occulynam21312 said:

    I really blog too and I am crafting a thing similar to this specific blog post, “Optimal Cycling Project

  • Werbebanner liefern Scareware aus said:

    [...] bis zum Schließen des Browsers. Ähnliche Erweiterungen sind auch für den Chrome Browser (z.B. NotScripts und ScriptNo) [...]

  • Wayne said:

    Thanks for the notscript program. I have one suggestion for the whitelist.
    Can you allow a range of addresses / subnet. I connect to many devices at work that use scripts to allow configuration of the device and they are all on the subnets 192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255, 172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255 and 10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255. It would be good to allow all these subnets. Otherwise I have to add each IP Address.

  • Tabby Caat said:

    I’m really disappointed that you haven’t yet found a way to enable bookmarklets without whitelisting sites. A bookmarklet runs from the user, not from a “site” – why can’t it be whitelisted as a script, rather than by site?

    For a work-around I’ve been taking the pages that I want to use the bookmarklet on, copying the url, opening the page in a new tab on another browser (one without notscript installed) and then using the bookmarklet. I think you will agree that this is a horrible workflow just to get something done that worked FINE before I installed your extension.

    What is really sad is that I didn’t have this issue with the noscript extension, so I know that that allowing bookmarklets can be done and I don’t understand why you haven’t done it.

  • JR Holmes said:

    I’m having a minor problem with NOTSCRIPT. After years of successful use (especially the very fine-grained control), over the past week when accessing the drop-down list as usual, the window is appearing as a white-on-white image. If I move the cursor over the area, I can see it change from the arrow to the hand pointer which indicates the possibility of selection, but the text never appears on my screen. This is occurring on multiple devices including both Macs and PCs.

    I’ve attempted to highlight the text in the drop-down with no success and nothing I do can make the text appear.

    I’m open to suggestions.

  • Benjamin said:

    You have brought up a very superb details , regards
    for the post.

  • javascript is cancer | hateandbile said:

    [...] day I discovered NotScript (http://optimalcycling.com/other-projects/notscripts/) was the day I was happy for a brief moment. When you visit a site, it lets you pick and choose the [...]

  • JR Holmes said:

    And, as suddenly as it started, it fixed itself. It has been continuing to work in its usual flawless manner since then.

  • http://takeoff.net.tr/ said:

    Due to several styles and colors of UGG boots and UGG shoes, it is possible
    to match your mood as well as your clothes. The artist material moisture from feet, keep it cold and dry.
    In addition, if you seem with the labels for the manufacturing site,
    you need to bear in mind how the labels which exhibit “Manufactured in China” are authentic,
    and lots of others are counterfeits.

  • admin.fire.sref.info said:

    Many customers have stated that after they have ordered these counterfeit, fake, imitation
    UGG’s, they will arrive in a plain, brown box that looked battered. And recollection, they will often eventually be willful Worn tedium without situation, so that the graduate are capable of doing their job. And reproductions may possibly appearance equally as terrific.

  • stahlkonstruktionen said:

    Unfortunately for Salazar he has pretty much forgotten that Hale is in the room and Hale decides to make
    his move, stabbing Salazar in the side.stahlkonstruktionen The virgin trees, as
    far as the eye could see, were broken or down, devoid of a
    single sprig of green. When you sweat, you release tension and anxiety.

  • DavidR said:

    Love the plugin but I’ve noticed the ‘noscript’ html tag doesn’t seem to be invoked when a site is blocked from running scripts.

  • DaveR said:

    I’ve noticed the ‘noscript’ html tag doesn’t seem to be invoked when a site is blocked from running scripts.

  • james t kirk said:

    Hi,

    First of all, Thank you very much for bringing NotScript for Google Chrome. Pardon’ me but I am just echoing this question from NoScript’s FAQ. I would like to know how to do this in NotScripts.

    “I’m worried by the fact some sites require the akamai.net domain to be whitelisted. I’d prefer not to allow it everywhere, but only on some parent sites I trust. How can I do it? ”

    Please let me and other users know,

    Thanks in advance for your help. Keep up the good work.

    Cheers,
    -jtk

  • Website said:

    You’re so cool! I don’t think I have read a
    single thing like this before. So good to find another person
    with original thoughts on this subject. Seriously.. thank you for starting this
    up. This site is something that’s needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

  • Becoming Internet Browser Agnostic | BlogSlayer said:

    [...] most missed extension when I originally switched over to Chrome, but Chrome has an extension called NotScripts that does the same thing and is also available in [...]

  • colon cleanse said:

    This piece of writing will help the internet users for setting up new
    website or even a weblog from start to end.

  • zimbabwe-fetp.net said:

    It’s an awesome paragraph in favor of all the online viewers; they will take advantage from it I am sure.

    My site about technology: iFinity wireless speakers; zimbabwe-fetp.net,

  • Chrome Security Cocktail | Voodoo PRIVACY COVoodoo PRIVACY CO said:

    [...] Sources: Notscripts, [...]

  • crossfit training said:

    Attractive section of content. I just stumbled
    upon your web site and in accession capital to
    say that I acquire actually enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing for your augment or even I success you get admission to consistently quickly.

    Also visit my weblog: crossfit training

  • gotmikhail said:

    Looking for a way to report bugs, but here goes:

    Running in Chrome 29.0.1547.65, Linux Fedora 19 64bit.

    The interface for allowing / temp allow / block in the address bar does not work. If I click on allow, it doesn’t change and the page doesn’t reload. This has worked fine for me in windows, os x, and fedora 14, all running the most up to date Chrome releases, windows running the dev channel.

  • Click Here said:

    you’re in reality a just right webmaster. The site loading speed is
    amazing. It seems that you are doing any distinctive trick.

    Furthermore, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a magnificent process in this
    subject!

  • Richard Hoefer said:

    Eric, if you read these comments, first, thank you for making this extension.
    I am usually not an idiot when it comes to instructions and setup requirements, but I have wasted an hour trying to locate the file path you specify in your instructions. I’m sorry to say your instructions are not clear, and not up to date as of OS X “Lion” and “Mountain Lion”. And now that I understand why, after Googling, you might want to re-write your instructions to help OS X users:

    The very first thing you say is:

    ————————————–
    Navigate to the NotScripts Folder

    Open the NotScripts Google Chrome extension folder. The location of this folder is shown below. You can go there by directly copying and pasting the appropriate address below into the location bar of a folder:
    ————————————–

    ** That’s already incorrect for OS X. There is no location bar in OS X. There is, however, a Menu Command under the “GO” Menu called “Go to Folder” . I pasted your link into it and got error message “The folder can’t be found”.

    Continuing with your instructions: You list this folder

    ————————————–
    Mac OS X: ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/Default/Extensions/odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn
    ————————————–

    ** I manually opened the whole folder hierarchy on my Mac starting from startup drive, and here’s why I was not able to find that location: The “Library” folder you specify is HIDDEN in OS X from version 10.7 to current 10.8 . I’m pasting in the solution hoping you will update your instructions to prevent other OSX users from getting frustrated: Here’s the URL at About.com :
    http://macs.about.com/od/usingyourmac/qt/Os-X-Lion-Is-Hiding-Your-Library-Folder.htm

    It reads:

    ——————————————-
    OS X Lion Is Hiding Your Library Folder
    How to Access Your Library Folder on Your Mac

    By Tom Nelson, About.com Guide

    Have you noticed something missing? OS X Lion hides your Library folder. Before the advent of OS X Lion, the Library folder was located at:

    Users/home folder/

    where ‘home folder’ is the short name of your currently logged in user account. For example, if your account’s short name is bettyo, the path to your Library would be:

    Users/bettyo/Library

    It’s not clear why Apple decided to hide the users Library folder, but there are two ways to get it back; one provided by Apple and one by the underlying file system. The method to use depends on whether you want permanent access to the Library folder, or only when you need to go there.

    Make the Library Visible Permanently

    Apple hides the Library folder by setting a file system flag associated with the folder. Any folder on your Mac can have its visibility flag turned on or off; Apple just chose to set the Library folder’s visibility flag to the off state. To reset the visibility flag, do the following:

    Launch Terminal, located at /Applications/Utilities.

    Enter the following command at the Terminal prompt:

    chflags nohidden ~/Library

    Once the command is executed, you can quit Terminal. The Library folder will now be visible in the Finder.

    Should you ever wish to set the Library folder back to its default hidden state in OS X Lion, simply launch Terminal and issue the following Terminal command:

    chflags hidden ~/Library

    ———————————-

    Hope that helps.

  • Richard Hoefer said:

    Eric, if you read these comments, first, thank you for making this extension.
    I am usually not an idiot when it comes to instructions and setup requirements, but I have wasted an hour trying to locate the file path you specify in your instructions. I’m sorry to say your instructions are not clear, and not up to date as of OS X “Lion” and “Mountain Lion”. And now that I understand why, after Googling, you might want to re-write your instructions to help OS X users:

    The very first thing you say is:

    ————————————–
    Navigate to the NotScripts Folder

    Open the NotScripts Google Chrome extension folder. The location of this folder is shown below. You can go there by directly copying and pasting the appropriate address below into the location bar of a folder:
    ————————————–

    ** That’s already incorrect for OS X. There is no location bar in OS X. There is, however, a Menu Command under the “GO” Menu called “Go to Folder” . I pasted your link into it and got error message “The folder can’t be found”.

    Continuing with your instructions: You list this folder

    ————————————–
    Mac OS X: ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/Default/Extensions/odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn
    ————————————–

    ** I manually opened the whole folder hierarchy on my Mac starting from startup drive, and here’s why I was not able to find that location: The “Library” folder you specify is HIDDEN in OS X from version 10.7 to current 10.8 . I’m pasting in the solution hoping you will update your instructions to prevent other OSX users from getting frustrated: Here’s the URL at About.com :
    http://macs.about.com/od/usingyourmac/qt/Os-X-Lion-Is-Hiding-Your-Library-Folder.htm

    It reads:

    ——————————————-
    OS X Lion Is Hiding Your Library Folder
    How to Access Your Library Folder on Your Mac

    By Tom Nelson, About.com Guide

    Have you noticed something missing? OS X Lion hides your Library folder. Before the advent of OS X Lion, the Library folder was located at:

    Users/home folder/

    where ‘home folder’ is the short name of your currently logged in user account. For example, if your account’s short name is bettyo, the path to your Library would be:

    Users/bettyo/Library

    It’s not clear why Apple decided to hide the users Library folder, but there are two ways to get it back; one provided by Apple and one by the underlying file system. The method to use depends on whether you want permanent access to the Library folder, or only when you need to go there.

    Make the Library Visible Permanently

    Apple hides the Library folder by setting a file system flag associated with the folder. Any folder on your Mac can have its visibility flag turned on or off; Apple just chose to set the Library folder’s visibility flag to the off state. To reset the visibility flag, do the following:

    Launch Terminal, located at /Applications/Utilities.

    Enter the following command at the Terminal prompt:

    chflags nohidden ~/Library

    Once the command is executed, you can quit Terminal. The Library folder will now be visible in the Finder.

    Should you ever wish to set the Library folder back to its default hidden state in OS X Lion, simply launch Terminal and issue the following Terminal command:

    chflags hidden ~/Library

    ———————————-

    Hope that helps.

  • Create a Professional website said:

    Oh,It’s too informative post,you have shared over here.Definitely,online viewers will take benefit from it…

  • NotScripter said:

    I’m having problems caused by NotScripts interfering with the display of pics on eBay.com

    Just take any item on eBay with additional pics that can be clicked for zoom in, for eg http://www.ebay.com/itm/181279137873

    I allowed
    ebay.com
    ebaystatic.com
    ebayrtm.com

    but after click on the “Mouse here to zoom in”, the in-tab dialog box shows no larger pic of the items, only the small thumbnails on the right panel. Clicking on those small thumbnails yield no larger pic.

    When I enable “Globally allow all temporarily”, the larger product pics appear.

    What gives? How can I resolve this issue NotScripts has with eBay.com?

    Thank you!

  • Hollywood Singing Lessons said:

    There aren’t enough vocal training programs in NYC that provide high quality teaching
    to inspired individuals who want to have a strong understanding of
    their singing and vocal ability. From there, we decide together which path is right for you.
    Let me say right here and now, if you can’t look at your audience, and I mean
    into their eyes, then you’re not a performer, at least not yet.

  • meanwhile in russia said:

    Hmm it looks like your website ate my first comment (it was extremely
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything.

    Do you have any suggestions for newbie blog writers?
    I’d certainly appreciate it.

  • Norma said:

    An interesting discusson is definitely worth comment.
    I think that youu should write more about this issue,
    it might not be a taboo subject but typically folks don’t talk
    about these issues. To the next! Many thanks!!

  • Hank Roberts said:

    You have spambots.

    Trying to install NotScripts in Chrome.
    I have an empty folder where the CHANGE_PASSWORD … file should be found.
    (Yes I’ve changed my users Library folder to be visible)
    (Yes I’m signed in to Chrome)

    I can create the missing file if I know the full text that should be in it — right?
    If so what should it be?

    I created one using the single line suggested but that does nothing.

  • fille de joie x said:

    Rսdement passionnant, selon moi cе poste derait intéresser un gars

  • Johnd395 said:

    Howdy! I basically would like to give a huge thumbs up for the good data you’ve got here on this post. I will probably be coming once again to your weblog for far more soon. dedggcedeeeb

  • Johnb2 said:

    omg! cant picture how quick time pass, after August, ber months time already and Setempber may be the 1st Christmas season in my location, I genuinely really like it! bekbcfegcefe

  • Hank Roberts said:

    No joy; is it broken under Mavericks? Nothing at all in the folder where the notscripts file should appear. The folder exists as named in the notscripts info page, but nothing in it.

  • Sabrina Noritake said:

    I really like notscripts, but is there any reason why it’s not showing up in the chrome store? I find it very odd that I still have the extension and can get the extension through the URL provided on your page but manually searching notscripts for Chrome in the Chrome store doesn’t bring up notscipts anymore… it brings up scriptsafe.

  • James said:

    I also think it’s unfortunate it is not showing up in search results in the store. More of a problem for me though, is that I can not fine Notscripts for Chrome OS anywhere at all. I have chromebook and really want to use this extension with it. ScriptSafe just doesn’t cut it for me.

  • website said:

    I every time spent my half an hour to read this web site’s content all the time
    along with a mug of coffee.

  • site map said:

    I havе read ѕο many articles oг reviews гegarding
    thе blogger lovers еxcept tҺіs article іs truly ɑ
    nice article, кeep it up.

  • http://gerardo51bfs.wordpress.com/2014/03/17/jak-radzic-sobie-z-otaczajacymi-nas-danymi/ said:

    They are important to your business as well as it
    used to, it could also be used as a point of differentiation that makes
    you cati cm sunt 4 inch stand out from your competition.
    An offer iss what the mail recipient gets once he acts on your mailing list quickly, quietly and effectively.

    Thhe team of professionals at Corporate Mailing Services can help you plan ahead, before you buy the entire
    list; if you get an unexpected increase in responses.

  • Stephan said:

    I’ve beern exploring foor a litttle bit for any high-quality articles or
    blog polsts in tis kind off house . Exploring in Yahoo I evewntually stumbled
    upon this site. Reading this information So i am satisfied
    to convewy that I have ann incredibly excellent uncanny feeling I found outt exactly what I needed.
    I such a lot no doubt wilkl make certain to ddo not disregard this site and provides it a look regularly.

    Feel free to surf to my web site Farm Heroes Saga walkthrough (Stephan)

  • bangkok office for rent said:

    What’s up, I read your blog on a regular basis. Your story-telling style
    is witty, keep doing what you’re doing!

  • Johne631 said:

    I am not sure where you are getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for fantastic information I was looking for this info for my mission. adadcddkgcdd

  • Johnd676 said:

    I think this is a real great blog post.Much thanks again. geekkeddccfc

  • John said:

    I study here http://www.motum.com/about-us/leadership/ misoprostol for sale must bring current documentation (Medical Clearance) from the treating health care

  • Jessika said:

    Good answer back in return of this issue with genuine arguments and telling everything about that.

  • http://c44.me said:

    Hi, I do believe this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it ;
    ) I will revisit yet again since I book-marked it. Money and freedom is the
    best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help others.

    Take a look at my web page :: http://c44.me

  • John said:

    hello,
    i am puzzled. is there any connection to this project: [ScriptBlock] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/scriptblock/hcdjknjpbnhdoabbngpmfekaecnpajba
    ?

  • danato said:

    Doesn’t work. I see no hidden file/folder in the extensions folder. Maybe it needs an update.

  • kim kardashian hollywood hack said:

    At this point the friar on the pilgrimage becomes
    quite upset and he interrupts the summoner. He knelt down to her level of eyesight, and sighed.

    They continually know exactly where enemy champions are by often glancing on the minimap.

    Feel free to surf to my web-site – kim kardashian hollywood hack

  • Phil Pustejovsky said:

    Phil Pustejovsky

    Optimal Cycling Project » NotScripts

  • Google said:

    No one routes for the evil villan who’s run off with the hero’s beau, same
    applies to a site that’s been stuck in Google‘s naughty corner.
    Dеѕріtе thе аѕѕurаnс
    е оf fооlрrооf рrіvасу рrо
    tесtіоn bу thеѕе ѕеаrсh еngіnе
    ѕ, уоu ѕhоuld lооk іntо іt реrѕ
    оnаllу. The only tab of your concern is Public Templates, and no actions are necessary as it is already on the screen.

  • Rocky said:

    Hi I have been using NotScript for quite sometime and I have been very happy with it.

    I happen to get a new machine and I was trying to install NotScript extension on chrome but when I search for NotScript in the chrome.google.com, it doesnt seem to find it. I am able to reach it via the direct link but I am confused why this should happen.

    Any insights ?

    regards,
    Rocky.

  • http://femmesdumaroc.com/le-club/152013/musik-downloads-und-der-weg-sie-muss-kaufen-them said:

    Yet, Jupiter Jack costs just ten dollars and when you buy on the official website you get a second one free at no additional cost, so just five dollars each.
    When they put the claims on the package what they really mean is under ideal conditions using
    GMRS which has lot more power at 5 watts. Besides,
    your regular home or car radio will not pick up the signal.

  • windows 8 said:

    For users wishing to install multiple operating systems on their hard drive and add a boot
    menu, then Windows 8 will be open to specific types of attack.
    If they can then it’s likely they will be able to win greater
    market share from Apple and Android as they progress into the future.
    Also, keyloggers, post-it notes and over-the-shoulder surfers make typing in passwords insecure.

  • health dating said:

    I must thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this website.
    I really hope to view the same high-grade blog posts from you in the future as
    well. In fact, your creative writing abilities
    has encouraged me to get my very own site now ;)

  • Marcus Widerberg said:

    Hello!
    Why has notscripts been removed from the chrome store?
    It has also been removed from my chrome installation!

    Any clues to this? I really need and miss it!

    BR! /marcus

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.